Bonjour, buenos dias, bom dia, Mr. Secretary General, Mr. Assistant
Secretary General, Ambassador Durand, my fellow panelists, distinguished
delegates to the OAS, ladies and gentlemen, it is a great delight for me
to participate in this panel today. I am excited about what is being
launched today because of the many years I have spent professionally in
the Americas and because, as the preceding panelists have stressed,
understanding the impact of gender inequality can help us plan and
implement more sustainable projects. I would like to share with you
Canadian experience in working with the principles of gender equality and
in staff training.
-
1976 – Guidelines on Women in Development
– based on the principles of "learn, do, revise"
-
1984 – CIDA’s first policy – Women in
Development (WID) – and from the start encouragement that staff not
look at equality of opportunity only, but equality of results –
Aesop’s fable of the crane and the fox illustrates the difference
between equality of opportunity and equality of results
-
I spent 1984-87 in Colombia and came back to
a changed CIDA – computers sprouting here and there and a concerted
effort by CIDA to engage in a change in corporate culture related to
implementing the new policy through a series of strategies lead by
senior management
-
A recognition that work on this issue
required technical skills – that it was not sufficient to be a
woman; that men can be and are champions for this issue
-
recruitment of specialists with backgrounds
in sociology, anthropology, education, and economics to advise staff
-
We began in 1986 by making training
compulsory for all staff.
-
Once the training course had been piloted,
CIDA’s executive committee demonstrated the Agency’s commitment by
taking the full course together. With that precedent, all staff was
gradually worked through the course. At the same time, we supported
training for our partners so that they could develop their own skills.
I mentioned earlier how we build on the principles of
"learn-do-revise". The courses at CIDA have changed over the
years so that the course reflects the reality of the average CIDA officer
and is concretely related to the work that he or she does.
What should staff know after taking the course?
-
They should have a common vocabulary about
gender equality, gender analysis, sex disaggregated data, monitoring
and evaluation, etc
-
They should understand how this relates to
their work – how it affects the criteria for selection of a project
or program, what it means in the design, implementation, and
evaluation of projects.
-
They should understand the need to collect
data disaggregated by sex, age, and diversity.
-
They should also know that they are not
expected to be experts – so they should know when and where to go
for help
Over the years, we have revised the course to reflect what we have
learned from evaluations, from the evolving understanding of development
in the international community – for example, what are the best
practices for undertaking gender based analysis?
After the 1995 World Conference on Women in Beijing, many of our
partners, whether donors or recipients, revised their national policies to
bring them more closely in line with the principles of "equality,
development and peace" and with the Convention on the Elimination of
all forms of Discrimination against Women. So in 1998, CIDA went out on
the Internet in English, French and Spanish to ask women and men across
Canada and in the global South to tell us what they liked about our policy
and what they didn’t. The consultation over the internet lasted six
weeks. We also looked at what our project evaluations told us ( again the
principle of "learn, do, revise") and at what other donors were
doing.
And came up with the policy that you will find on the CIDA web site (www.acdi-cida.gc.ca/equality)
in all the languages of the OAS: we changed the goal of the policy to
"equality between women and men" and focused on three
objectives:
One is Human rights
- Discrimination against women persists in every country, constituting
the biggest barrier to women’s ability to exercise their human rights.
in many countries, women do not have equal rights with men in the
following areas: ownership of property, freedom to travel, transferring
nationality, divorce and custody of children, access to credit. This is
both a social justice and an economic development issue.
One is about access to and control over the resources and benefits
of development
- there is a tendency to think of gender equality as a
"social" issue but let’s be frank -- inequality is grounded in
economic inequality -- who inherits? who owns land? whose family must pay
a dowry? Who gets access to income?
-- Because they generally have less formal education and technical
training than men, women are more likely to be poor. For a number of
reasons, women and men become poor and respond to poverty in different
ways and as a group, women are more vulnerable to poverty's extremes. And
because of women s important responsibility for maintaining the home and
caring for children, this vulnerability often results in the transmission
of this poverty to the next generation. Gender analysis reveals
opportunities to address the structural causes of poverty which are
specific to the lives of poor women and men.
And the final CIDA objective is about Decision-making:
- Democracy is threatened when a significant proportion of the
population is not represented in the decision making process. Women are
vastly underrepresented as participants and decision makers in
government, business and social institutions, including the home.
Consequently, women's perspectives are missing from many critical
decisions which govern their lives and decide the futures of their
communities.
So CIDA has been working with equality concepts for a long time and
none of this has been easy: it's a crosscutting theme that needs to be
incorporated into our understanding of just about everything. Our policy
says to CIDA staff and partners: Instead of merely targeting women as
recipients of aid, women's, as well as men’s, experiences can and should
inform the design, implementation and evaluation of CIDA's policies,
programs, and projects. And that gender equality is a development issue in
and of itself.
We start from the premise that paying attention to gender equality
issues and looking at our planning with a gender lens improves the quality
of the design, lessens the risks because we know more about the context in
which our investment is undertaken, and increases the potential for
poverty reduction. And we don't do this only because it is a social
justice goal. We do it because it makes hard bottom line sense.
Cecilia Valdivieso has outlined for you the findings of the World Bank
"Engendering Development" a policy research report that looked
at gender inequality at the start of the 21st century.
Jim Wolfensohn, President of the Bank, wrote in the Preface "Large
gender disparities in basic human rights, in resources and economic
opportunity, and political voice are pervasive around the world - in spite
of recent gains".
I had one of those AHA moments when I read "Engendering
Development" and matched the World Bank’s 3 issues (basic human
rights, access to resources and economic opportunity, political voice) to
each of the 3 CIDA policy objectives (realization of human rights, access
to and control over resources, and participation in decision-making) that
we had identified in 1998.
A 2001 study by the American Institute for Women's Policy Research
shows that overall American women are more likely to participate in civic
and community activities than men are and that women who feel safe in
their neighbourhoods are 75 percent more likely to play active roles. So
in the US, just as in the rest of the Americas, making women feel safe and
welcome has a dramatically beneficial effect on social engagement and on
community development. But in many countries, gender inequalities and
insecurity limit women's participation in public spaces. To make safe
neighbourhoods where both women and men can speak and act without fear
requires work on peacebuilding, conflict resolution, legislation, police
training, culturally sensitive attitude change management, strengthened
courts, all of which require time, money, and political will.
What are the costs of not making a public space for women's voices?
- there's a cost to the health of democracy
- there's a cost associated with the quality of policy decisions when
only the voices of the powerful or the in crowd are listened to
So whether we’re talking about human rights, resources and economic
opportunity, or political voice, equality issues are in effect key issues
related to democratization, economic growth and growth with equity and the
realization of human rights for all. They relate to the fundamentals of
how we live today and the vision we have for tomorrow. That is why we are
delighted to partner the OAS and the CIM as you embark on a process of
developing the strategies to mainstream gender equality in your work.